Random Forest

Random Forest Overview

• Get in bed

• Count sheep

• Ensemble machine learning method based on a large number of decision trees voting to predict a classification

• Benefits compared to decision tree:

  • Able to function with incomplete data -Lower likelihood of an overfit -Improved prediction accuracy

Bootstrap Sampling (Bagging)

• Each decision tree uses a random sample of the original dataset
  • Using a subset of the dataset reduces the probability of an overfit model
  • Rows with missing data will often be left out of the sample, improving performance

Random Feature Selection

• A random set of features is selected for each node in training
  • Information about feature importance may be saved and applies in future iterations
  • Even with automated random feature selection, feature selection and engineering prior to training may improve performance

Prediction

• Each trained decision tree produces its own prediction
  • Decision trees are independent, and were trained on different subsets of both data and features

Random Feature Selection

• A random set of features is selected for each node in training
  • Information about feature importance may be saved and applies in future iterations
  • Even with automated random feature selection, feature selection and engineering prior to training may improve performance

Ensemble Voting

• The results from each decision tree are combined into a voting classifier
  • The mode of the classification results will be the final prediction

Dataset

• South African Red List
  • Data about plants with their habitat, traits, distribution, and factors influencing their current threatened/extinct status
• Purpose
  • Predict whether or not an unknown plant is threatened based on the above characteristics

Visuals 1

- Test

Visuals 2

-

Analysis

• 5 separate random forest models were created using separate methods of normalization

Data Preparation

• Preprocessing
  • Encode categorical features into numerical / factor features
  • Split the training set into a training and test set, avoiding class imbalance

Preprocessing

• Class Imbalance
  • Resample smaller classes in order to approximate equal classes
  • Training on imbalanced datasets will bias predictions to the larger class

Normalizatoin

• Apply 5 normalization techniques to both training and test datasets
  • Min-Max
  • Z-Score
  • Max Absolute Value
  • L1 Norm
  • L2 Norm

Prediction

• Combine results into a vector
• Identify the most frequently predicted class
• Iterate over entire test set, storing results
• Generate a confusion matrix, calculate the sensitivity, and precision for each category
• Iterate after tuning if necessary

Results